Sunday, January 21, 2018

Totemic 3








Texas A&M University. Department of Architecture Fall 2017.
Totemism. a Gallery fo Louise Nevelson, Houston, TX.
Student: Finn Rattana
I am using the notion of totemic as an ontological exploration and as a strategy of stacking 3 different ontologies to become one,
In my specific case, I began my project by borrowing some ideas of my original indexical model as some kind of interpretation that brought certain parts back, however presented them in a different sense.
The project is about the argument FIGURE and poche as well as the idea of representation using  2-dimensional flatness of the architectural image giving a graphic sense and 3-dimensional objects.
 I started by taking the idea of the figural objects from the indexical model of the Kronish House by Richard Neutra. After that, I used a sculpture, Night Flight by Louise Nevelson misreading it as a manual to conform the section.
By exploring with scaling, extrusion, and booleaning methods, the objects start to have a relationship that connected the different objects by a series of local contingencies beginning to read as one object, however the real connection comes from something else. From there, I introduced figure in different ways such as:
 figure as poche,
figure as space,
figure as small and large objects,
figure as ground
However, the project is not just about the figures, but also dealing with the idea of flatness to volume or mass or the relationship of 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional.
The front façade argues the idea of flatness which is 2-dimensional, but from the back, it is about  a 3- dimensional object that brings a flat plane and volume together. The figures used in the project start to tie everything together. Moreover, the object is also but the use of linework, this becomes a critical moment where all of these lines begin to interact throughout the project.  This idea was taken from my indexical model .
As the linework comes across and goes though the ground and starts to build up into the project in different ways, it starts interacting and making connections between the ground and the objects. Then, it becomes its own profile, then as window mullion, as elevation or even become ornamentation.

The ground and the object are basically connected by the idea of the figure, that happens is mass and volume but also in plan and section. in other words figure and line work brings the object together, the project is a weirdly hybridized object that falls into a speculative type, it addresses the post-digital criteria of a combination of Lo-Fi or Hi-Fi operations. Like most of the projects in the class my object becomes an architecture of defiance challenging norms of aesthetics by using the release of the figure.